Skip to content

zellij-org/strider

Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.

Open on GitHub
Current stars
8
Activity since
2020
Latest activity
Feb 2024

Public star activity

Last 30 days
+1
Last 90 days
+1
Actions / day
0.0
Public star actions

stars from November 17, 2020 to February 26, 2024, peaking at 7.7 STARS3 YR 3 MO7FEB 2024NOV 2020

7 stars on February 26, 2024.

stars by date
Datestars
November 17, 20202
November 18, 20204
December 17, 20205
May 1, 20236
February 26, 20247

The last 90 days run ahead of this repository's lifetime average.

The commit history reads zellij-org/strider a second time

methodology

Fix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.

Fix-labelled changes
Fix-labelled changes for zellij-org/strider
File change frequency
File change frequency for zellij-org/strider
Bus factor
Bus factor for zellij-org/strider
Maintenance pulse
Maintenance pulse for zellij-org/strider
Contributors
Contributors for zellij-org/strider
Language activity
Language activity for zellij-org/strider
Commit activity
Commit activity for zellij-org/strider
Recent TODO/FIXME movement
Recent TODO/FIXME movement for zellij-org/strider

Attention is not adoption.

Stars against usage

No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.

Earned badges

badge studio

Maintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.

Reading badge evidence for zellij-org/strider.

Notes on zellij-org/strider

How many stars does zellij-org/strider have?
GitHub currently reports 8 stars for zellij-org/strider. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
What does recent star activity look like for strider?
gitdebt observed about 1 public star actions for zellij-org/strider over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's faster than its lifetime average activity pace.
Is strider still active?
Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for zellij-org/strider in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
When was strider created?
zellij-org/strider was created on November 17, 2020. The first public star activity observed for zellij-org/strider is from Nov 2020.

Put this drawing in your README

markdown for agents

The block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.

README.md · zellij-org/strider star history
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/zellij-org/strider?ref=readme">
  <picture>
    <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/zellij-org/strider/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
    <img alt="zellij-org/strider star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/zellij-org/strider/chart.svg?theme=light" />
  </picture>
</a>

<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through February 26, 2024 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/zellij-org/strider?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>

Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.

Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.