How many stars does withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build have?

GitHub currently reports 23 stars for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.

What does recent star activity look like for contribute.docs.astro.build?

gitdebt observed about 1 public star actions for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's below its lifetime average activity pace, which is common for mature projects.

Is contribute.docs.astro.build still active?

Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.

When was contribute.docs.astro.build created?

withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build was created on September 27, 2023. The first public star activity observed for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build is from Sep 2023.

withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build

Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.

Open on GitHub

Current stars: 23
Activity since: 2023
Latest activity: Dec 2025

Public star activity

Last 30 days: +1
Last 90 days: +1
Actions / day: 0.0

Public star actions

FromTo

stars by date
Date	stars
September 29, 2023	1
November 30, 2023	2
December 3, 2023	3
December 4, 2023	5
December 10, 2023	6
January 3, 2024	7
February 17, 2024	8
March 16, 2024	9
March 28, 2024	10
April 16, 2024	11
April 22, 2024	12
May 23, 2024	13
June 2, 2024	14
June 25, 2024	15
July 18, 2024	16
November 11, 2024	17
May 9, 2025	18
August 1, 2025	19
December 8, 2025	20

The last 90 days run behind its lifetime average, which is ordinary for a mature project.

The commit history reads withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build a second time

methodology

Fix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.

Fix-labelled changes for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build — Fix-labelled changes

File change frequency for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build — File change frequency

Bus factor for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build — Bus factor

Maintenance pulse for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build — Maintenance pulse

Contributors for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build — Contributors

Language activity for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build — Language activity

Commit activity for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build — Commit activity

Recent TODO/FIXME movement for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build — Recent TODO/FIXME movement

Attention is not adoption.

Stars against usage

No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.

Earned badges

badge studio

Maintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.

Reading badge evidence for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build.

Notes on withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build

How many stars does withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build have?: GitHub currently reports 23 stars for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
What does recent star activity look like for contribute.docs.astro.build?: gitdebt observed about 1 public star actions for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's below its lifetime average activity pace, which is common for mature projects.
Is contribute.docs.astro.build still active?: Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
When was contribute.docs.astro.build created?: withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build was created on September 27, 2023. The first public star activity observed for withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build is from Sep 2023.

Read contribute.docs.astro.build against a neighbour

comparison builder

Compare with any repository

Put this drawing in your README

markdown for agents

The block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.

README.md · withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build star history

<a href="https://gitdebt.com/withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build?ref=readme">
  <picture>
    <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
    <img alt="withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build/chart.svg?theme=light" />
  </picture>
</a>

<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through December 8, 2025 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/withastro/contribute.docs.astro.build?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>

Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.

Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.