Skip to content

jgthms/bulma vs twbs/bootstrap

  • jgthms/bulma

    Stars

    50,056

    First recorded star in 2016.

  • twbs/bootstrap

    Stars

    174,817

    First recorded star in 2011.

Star history overlay

207k STARS15 YR 1 MOjgthms/bulma57ktwbs/bootstrap207k

jgthms/bulma: 57,229 stars on September 15, 2026. twbs/bootstrap: 207,227 stars on September 16, 2026.

Star history for jgthms/bulma
DateStars
January 24, 20162
March 8, 20165838
April 22, 20166369
June 6, 20166910
July 21, 20167391
September 4, 20169173
October 19, 20169947
December 2, 201610926
January 16, 201712192
March 2, 201713809
April 25, 201715514
June 9, 201716887
July 24, 201718409
September 6, 201720074
October 21, 201721711
December 5, 201723909
January 19, 201825272
March 5, 201826674
April 20, 201827903
June 3, 201829128
July 18, 201830191
September 1, 201831413
October 16, 201832377
November 30, 201833369
January 14, 201934249
February 27, 201935285
April 13, 201936359
May 28, 201937287
July 12, 201938171
August 26, 201938936
October 19, 201939884
December 2, 201940536
January 16, 202041193
March 1, 202041858
April 15, 202042590
May 30, 202043433
July 14, 202044079
August 28, 202044709
October 12, 202045310
November 26, 202045854
January 10, 202146346
February 24, 202146958
April 10, 202147515
May 27, 202147912
July 11, 202148353
August 28, 202148729
October 13, 202149042
December 5, 202149352
January 19, 202249719
March 4, 202250069
April 27, 202250455
June 11, 202250759
July 26, 202251022
September 9, 202251344
October 24, 202251625
December 8, 202251925
January 23, 202352194
March 9, 202352511
April 23, 202352793
June 7, 202353001
July 22, 202353218
September 5, 202353424
October 22, 202353621
December 8, 202353801
January 23, 202454011
March 8, 202454250
April 23, 202454934
June 6, 202455182
July 21, 202455443
September 5, 202455792
October 30, 202456101
December 15, 202456259
February 1, 202556443
March 17, 202556635
May 2, 202556789
June 25, 202556912
August 23, 202557014
November 8, 202557094
January 22, 202657174
September 15, 202657229
Star history for twbs/bootstrap
DateStars
August 19, 2011972
October 22, 20117715
December 26, 201111625
March 1, 201219467
November 15, 201223508
January 19, 201327064
March 25, 201331814
May 29, 201335890
August 2, 201340503
October 6, 201345340
December 23, 201349454
February 26, 201452674
May 2, 201455829
July 6, 201458648
September 9, 201461664
November 13, 201465153
January 17, 201568167
March 23, 201571610
May 27, 201574963
July 31, 201578457
October 3, 201582552
December 7, 201585996
February 11, 201689370
April 16, 201692763
June 20, 201695973
August 24, 201699200
October 28, 2016103308
January 1, 2017106521
March 7, 2017110986
May 11, 2017114922
July 28, 2017118732
October 1, 2017122428
December 5, 2017126277
February 8, 2018130072
April 15, 2018133021
June 19, 2018135521
August 23, 2018137640
October 27, 2018139739
December 31, 2018141694
March 6, 2019144040
May 9, 2019146725
July 13, 2019148951
September 16, 2019150889
November 20, 2019152783
January 24, 2020154772
March 29, 2020156777
June 2, 2020159319
August 6, 2020162307
October 11, 2020164140
December 15, 2020166031
March 3, 2021169786
May 7, 2021171585
July 14, 2021174016
September 20, 2021175734
November 29, 2021177014
February 2, 2022178786
April 8, 2022180455
June 12, 2022182575
August 16, 2022184148
October 20, 2022185717
December 23, 2022187078
February 26, 2023188704
May 2, 2023190375
July 6, 2023192241
September 9, 2023193416
November 13, 2023194553
January 17, 2024195572
March 22, 2024196760
May 26, 2024197885
July 30, 2024199145
October 16, 2024201931
December 20, 2024202970
February 23, 2025203897
April 29, 2025204929
July 3, 2025205509
September 6, 2025206276
November 18, 2025206630
January 22, 2026206897
April 8, 2026207089
September 16, 2026207227

Repository health compared

Live analysis · unavailable data stays labelled

Popularity is only one axis. Compare technical scale, maintenance cadence, ownership resilience and change pressure against the same completed analysis that sits behind each report.

Reach

Popularity and real-world adoption

Signaljgthms/bulmatwbs/bootstrap
GitHub starsCurrent public GitHub metadata total.50,056Best result in this row: 174,817
Stars gained · trailing 90dChange in the newest 90 days covered by each cached series.+12Best result in this row: +65
ForksCurrent public GitHub metadata total.Not availableNot available
Largest package audienceLargest resolved registry total; sources are shown explicitly.No resolved packageNo resolved package
Repository ageElapsed years since the GitHub creation timestamp.11 years15 years

Codebase

Size and technical center of gravity

Signaljgthms/bulmatwbs/bootstrap
Dominant languageLargest share of analyzed code lines at current HEAD.Not availableNot available
Code linesAnalyzed source lines at current HEAD, excluding blanks and comments.Not availableNot available
Languages representedLanguages with non-zero files or line counts.Not availableNot available

Maintenance

Commit volume and recent operating cadence

Signaljgthms/bulmatwbs/bootstrap
Repository commitsFull repository commit total reported by the analysis.Not availableNot available
Commits · trailing 90dCommit count in the newest 90 days covered by the repository analysis.Not availableNot available

Ownership

How broadly maintenance responsibility is distributed

Signaljgthms/bulmatwbs/bootstrap
Bus factorFewest analyzed contributors carrying at least half the commits.Not availableNot available
Top contributor concentrationShare of attributed commits carried by the most active contributor.Not availableNot available

Change signals

Debt markers and fix pressure in frequently changed files

Signaljgthms/bulmatwbs/bootstrap
Fix-labelled share · frequently changed filesFix-labelled commits divided by commits across the analyzed high-frequency file set.Not availableNot available
Recent TODO/FIXME movementLatest cumulative marker count and its change over the trailing 90 days.Not availableNot available

Both curves are drawn on shared axes. They are not drawn from a shared source: each series names its own below.

One axis, two sources

The overlay puts both repositories on one axis. It does not put them on one source: since July 2026 a stargazer-list series stops on a fixed date, while a series rebuilt from public archive events keeps receiving points. Each column below states its own reading.

How the star series for jgthms/bulma and twbs/bootstrap were read
Fieldjgthms/bulmatwbs/bootstrap
SourceHistorical star dataHistorical star data
CoverageCovers through September 15, 2026Covers through September 16, 2026
StateStill updatingStill updating

No row states how much of a history is missing. An archive series records star actions and not unstars, so it can exceed a repository's own star total, and a figure for the difference would be wrong exactly where it looks most precise.

Notes on this comparison

  • Which has more GitHub stars, jgthms/bulma or twbs/bootstrap?

    GitHub reports 174,817 stars for twbs/bootstrap and 50,056 for jgthms/bulma.

  • Do both star histories cover the same period?

    Not necessarily, and each chart names its own. jgthms/bulma — Historical star data · Covers through September 15, 2026 · Still updating. twbs/bootstrap — Historical star data · Covers through September 16, 2026 · Still updating. Since July 2026 GitHub serves a repository's stargazer list only to its own admins and collaborators, so one series can stop on a fixed date while the other keeps flowing from public archive events.

  • How is this comparison computed?

    Star totals come from public repository metadata. The two curves are each repository's stored star series drawn on shared axes, from whichever source is named above. Repository-health figures are computed independently from each project's commit history.