Skip to content

chroma-core/chroma vs facebookresearch/faiss

  • chroma-core/chroma

    Stars

    29,685

    First recorded star in 2022.

  • facebookresearch/faiss

    Stars

    41,647

    First recorded star in 2017.

Star history overlay

42k STARS9 YR 9 MOchroma-core/chroma30kfacebookresearch/faiss42k

chroma-core/chroma: 29,682 stars on November 13, 2026. facebookresearch/faiss: 41,634 stars on November 14, 2026.

Star history for chroma-core/chroma
DateStars
December 13, 20222
February 15, 2023149
March 4, 2023441
March 22, 2023646
April 8, 20232010
April 25, 20233856
May 13, 20234685
May 30, 20235411
June 16, 20235959
July 4, 20236469
July 24, 20237096
August 11, 20237515
August 28, 20237823
September 14, 20238120
October 2, 20238410
October 19, 20238662
November 5, 20238914
November 23, 20239182
December 10, 20239488
December 27, 20239757
January 14, 202410055
January 31, 202410340
February 18, 202410583
March 6, 202410879
March 23, 202411170
April 10, 202411530
April 27, 202411846
May 14, 202412114
June 1, 202412396
June 18, 202412687
July 9, 202413065
July 26, 202413346
August 12, 202413615
August 30, 202413869
September 16, 202414110
October 3, 202414338
October 21, 202414582
November 7, 202414840
November 24, 202415119
December 12, 202415381
December 29, 202415653
January 16, 202516561
February 2, 202516904
February 19, 202517420
March 9, 202517998
March 26, 202518454
April 12, 202518803
April 30, 202519138
May 17, 202519434
June 3, 202519802
June 24, 202520209
July 11, 202520556
July 29, 202520933
August 15, 202521271
September 1, 202522450
September 19, 202522985
October 6, 202523304
October 23, 202523614
November 10, 202523918
November 27, 202524208
December 15, 202524536
January 1, 202624853
January 18, 202625194
February 5, 202625611
February 22, 202625889
March 11, 202626226
March 29, 202626705
April 15, 202627173
May 2, 202627496
May 20, 202627776
June 9, 202628112
June 27, 202628401
July 14, 202628607
July 31, 202628760
August 18, 202628950
September 4, 202629120
September 21, 202629265
October 9, 202629412
October 26, 202629558
November 13, 202629682
Star history for facebookresearch/faiss
DateStars
February 15, 20171
April 11, 20171454
May 29, 20171702
July 14, 20171867
September 4, 20171990
October 23, 20172114
December 6, 20172318
January 20, 20182690
March 5, 20183012
April 21, 20183287
June 15, 20183667
July 29, 20183942
September 11, 20184224
October 26, 20184503
December 9, 20184802
January 22, 20195203
March 7, 20195525
April 20, 20195873
June 4, 20196255
July 18, 20196666
August 31, 20197042
October 14, 20197369
November 27, 20197793
January 10, 20208186
February 23, 20208498
April 7, 20208803
May 22, 20209253
July 5, 20209693
August 18, 202010140
October 1, 202010543
November 23, 202011088
January 6, 202111549
February 19, 202111985
April 4, 202112534
May 18, 202112966
July 1, 202113383
August 15, 202113780
September 28, 202114147
November 11, 202114539
December 26, 202115244
February 8, 202215597
March 24, 202215973
May 7, 202216336
June 20, 202216664
August 4, 202217037
September 17, 202217384
October 31, 202217761
December 14, 202218114
January 28, 202318479
March 13, 202319135
May 5, 202320838
June 18, 202322046
August 1, 202323031
September 14, 202323788
October 29, 202324464
December 12, 202325190
January 25, 202425873
March 9, 202426652
April 22, 202427476
June 5, 202428220
July 19, 202428966
September 1, 202429661
October 16, 202430361
November 29, 202431114
January 12, 202531770
February 25, 202532692
April 10, 202533688
May 24, 202534577
July 7, 202535410
August 20, 202536194
October 12, 202537004
November 26, 202537724
January 9, 202638304
February 22, 202638814
April 7, 202639358
May 21, 202639872
July 4, 202640294
August 17, 202640654
September 30, 202640942
November 14, 202641634

Repository health compared

Live analysis · unavailable data stays labelled

Popularity is only one axis. Compare technical scale, maintenance cadence, ownership resilience and change pressure against the same completed analysis that sits behind each report.

Reach

Popularity and real-world adoption

Signalchroma-core/chromafacebookresearch/faiss
GitHub starsCurrent public GitHub metadata total.29,685Best result in this row: 41,647
Stars gained · trailing 90dChange in the newest 90 days covered by each cached series.+766Best result in this row: +1,051
ForksCurrent public GitHub metadata total.Reading…Reading…
Largest package audienceLargest resolved registry total; sources are shown explicitly.Reading…Reading…
Repository ageElapsed years since the GitHub creation timestamp.4.1 years9.8 years

Codebase

Size and technical center of gravity

Signalchroma-core/chromafacebookresearch/faiss
Dominant languageLargest share of analyzed code lines at current HEAD.Reading…Reading…
Code linesAnalyzed source lines at current HEAD, excluding blanks and comments.Reading…Reading…
Languages representedLanguages with non-zero files or line counts.Reading…Reading…

Maintenance

Commit volume and recent operating cadence

Signalchroma-core/chromafacebookresearch/faiss
Repository commitsFull repository commit total reported by the analysis.Reading…Reading…
Commits · trailing 90dCommit count in the newest 90 days covered by the repository analysis.Reading…Reading…

Ownership

How broadly maintenance responsibility is distributed

Signalchroma-core/chromafacebookresearch/faiss
Bus factorFewest analyzed contributors carrying at least half the commits.Reading…Reading…
Top contributor concentrationShare of attributed commits carried by the most active contributor.Reading…Reading…

Change signals

Debt markers and fix pressure in frequently changed files

Signalchroma-core/chromafacebookresearch/faiss
Fix-labelled share · frequently changed filesFix-labelled commits divided by commits across the analyzed high-frequency file set.Reading…Reading…
Recent TODO/FIXME movementLatest cumulative marker count and its change over the trailing 90 days.Reading…Reading…

Both curves are drawn on shared axes. They are not drawn from a shared source: each series names its own below.

One axis, two sources

The overlay puts both repositories on one axis. It does not always put them on one source: a series not yet read again from GitHub's star history can stop on the date GitHub closed its stargazer list, or be rebuilt from public archive events. Each column below states its own reading.

How the star series for chroma-core/chroma and facebookresearch/faiss were read
Fieldchroma-core/chromafacebookresearch/faiss
SourceGitHub star historyGitHub star history
CoverageCovers through November 14, 2026Covers through November 14, 2026
StateStill updatingStill updating

No row states how much of a history is missing. An archive series records star actions and not unstars, so it can exceed a repository's own star total, and a figure for the difference would be wrong exactly where it looks most precise.

Notes on this comparison

  • Which has more GitHub stars, chroma-core/chroma or facebookresearch/faiss?

    GitHub reports 41,647 stars for facebookresearch/faiss and 29,685 for chroma-core/chroma.

  • Do both star histories cover the same period?

    Not necessarily, and each chart names its own. chroma-core/chroma — GitHub star history · Covers through November 14, 2026 · Still updating. facebookresearch/faiss — GitHub star history · Covers through November 14, 2026 · Still updating. A series read from GitHub's star history runs to its latest read. One read before that existed can stop on the date GitHub closed its stargazer list in July 2026, or come from public archive events, until gitdebt reads it again.

  • How is this comparison computed?

    Star totals come from public repository metadata. The two curves are each repository's stored star series drawn on shared axes, from whichever source is named above. Repository-health figures are computed independently from each project's commit history.