Skip to content

chroma-core/chroma vs facebookresearch/faiss

  • chroma-core/chroma

    Stars

    29,316

    First recorded star in 2022.

  • facebookresearch/faiss

    Stars

    40,914

    First recorded star in 2017.

Star history overlay

38k STARS9 YR 7 MOchroma-core/chroma23kfacebookresearch/faiss38k

chroma-core/chroma: 22,719 stars on September 16, 2026. facebookresearch/faiss: 37,559 stars on September 16, 2026.

Star history for chroma-core/chroma
DateStars
December 13, 20221
February 14, 2023108
March 1, 2023388
March 17, 2023566
April 1, 2023863
April 16, 20233293
May 2, 20234104
May 17, 20234816
June 1, 20235396
June 17, 20235888
July 5, 20236401
July 21, 20236922
August 5, 20237297
August 20, 20237589
September 5, 20237854
September 20, 20238130
October 5, 20238345
October 21, 20238583
November 5, 20238814
November 20, 20239032
December 6, 20239307
December 21, 20239543
January 6, 20249789
January 21, 202410036
February 5, 202410296
February 21, 202410502
March 7, 202410767
March 22, 202411030
April 7, 202411309
April 22, 202411593
May 11, 202411900
May 26, 202412133
June 10, 202412373
June 26, 202412680
July 11, 202412950
July 26, 202413182
August 11, 202413445
August 26, 202413650
September 10, 202413848
September 26, 202414081
October 11, 202414266
October 27, 202414497
November 11, 202414725
November 26, 202414955
December 12, 202415167
December 27, 202415407
January 11, 202516213
January 27, 202516519
February 11, 202516869
February 26, 202517315
March 17, 202517857
April 1, 202518206
April 17, 202518492
May 2, 202518759
May 17, 202519008
June 2, 202519255
June 17, 202519451
July 2, 202519645
July 18, 202519862
August 2, 202520033
August 18, 202520211
September 2, 202520895
September 17, 202521140
October 3, 202521317
October 24, 202521431
November 8, 202521542
November 24, 202521660
December 9, 202521776
December 24, 202521896
January 9, 202622037
January 27, 202622199
February 12, 202622297
February 28, 202622373
March 15, 202622442
March 31, 202622499
April 15, 202622586
May 1, 202622628
May 21, 202622663
June 20, 202622689
September 16, 202622719
Star history for facebookresearch/faiss
DateStars
March 1, 201727
April 11, 20171617
May 24, 20171885
July 7, 20172056
August 20, 20172183
October 7, 20172306
November 20, 20172472
January 2, 20182709
February 13, 20183238
March 27, 20183496
May 18, 20183821
June 28, 20184108
August 10, 20184396
September 21, 20184689
November 3, 20184920
December 15, 20185234
January 27, 20195587
March 9, 20195887
April 20, 20196258
June 1, 20196646
July 13, 20197045
August 24, 20197474
October 5, 20197800
November 15, 20198202
December 27, 20198656
February 7, 20208999
March 19, 20209286
April 30, 20209692
June 11, 202010170
July 23, 202010631
September 13, 202011161
October 24, 202011535
December 5, 202012046
January 17, 202112536
February 28, 202112964
April 11, 202113553
May 26, 202113943
July 6, 202114372
August 17, 202114752
October 1, 202115124
November 19, 202115388
December 31, 202116115
February 11, 202216473
March 24, 202216835
May 5, 202217181
June 16, 202217486
July 27, 202217817
September 7, 202218182
October 19, 202218563
November 29, 202218898
January 18, 202319251
March 1, 202319828
April 12, 202320935
May 24, 202322119
July 4, 202323168
August 15, 202324048
September 26, 202324753
November 6, 202325404
December 18, 202326032
January 29, 202426739
March 10, 202427443
April 21, 202428233
June 2, 202428916
July 13, 202429680
August 24, 202430382
October 5, 202431060
November 15, 202431716
December 27, 202432423
February 7, 202533135
March 20, 202534062
May 9, 202535009
June 20, 202535631
August 1, 202536124
September 11, 202536477
October 29, 202536769
December 10, 202537043
January 20, 202637232
March 4, 202637382
April 21, 202637489
September 16, 202637559

Repository health compared

Live analysis · unavailable data stays labelled

Popularity is only one axis. Compare technical scale, maintenance cadence, ownership resilience and change pressure against the same completed analysis that sits behind each report.

Reach

Popularity and real-world adoption

Signalchroma-core/chromafacebookresearch/faiss
GitHub starsCurrent public GitHub metadata total.29,316Best result in this row: 40,914
Stars gained · trailing 90dChange in the newest 90 days covered by each cached series.Best result in this row: +33+11
ForksCurrent public GitHub metadata total.Not availableNot available
Largest package audienceLargest resolved registry total; sources are shown explicitly.No resolved packageNo resolved package
Repository ageElapsed years since the GitHub creation timestamp.3.9 years9.6 years

Codebase

Size and technical center of gravity

Signalchroma-core/chromafacebookresearch/faiss
Dominant languageLargest share of analyzed code lines at current HEAD.Not availableNot available
Code linesAnalyzed source lines at current HEAD, excluding blanks and comments.Not availableNot available
Languages representedLanguages with non-zero files or line counts.Not availableNot available

Maintenance

Commit volume and recent operating cadence

Signalchroma-core/chromafacebookresearch/faiss
Repository commitsFull repository commit total reported by the analysis.Not availableNot available
Commits · trailing 90dCommit count in the newest 90 days covered by the repository analysis.Not availableNot available

Ownership

How broadly maintenance responsibility is distributed

Signalchroma-core/chromafacebookresearch/faiss
Bus factorFewest analyzed contributors carrying at least half the commits.Not availableNot available
Top contributor concentrationShare of attributed commits carried by the most active contributor.Not availableNot available

Change signals

Debt markers and fix pressure in frequently changed files

Signalchroma-core/chromafacebookresearch/faiss
Fix-labelled share · frequently changed filesFix-labelled commits divided by commits across the analyzed high-frequency file set.Not availableNot available
Recent TODO/FIXME movementLatest cumulative marker count and its change over the trailing 90 days.Not availableNot available

Both curves are drawn on shared axes. They are not drawn from a shared source: each series names its own below.

One axis, two sources

The overlay puts both repositories on one axis. It does not put them on one source: since July 2026 a stargazer-list series stops on a fixed date, while a series rebuilt from public archive events keeps receiving points. Each column below states its own reading.

How the star series for chroma-core/chroma and facebookresearch/faiss were read
Fieldchroma-core/chromafacebookresearch/faiss
SourceHistorical star dataHistorical star data
CoverageCovers through September 16, 2026Covers through September 16, 2026
StateStill updatingStill updating

No row states how much of a history is missing. An archive series records star actions and not unstars, so it can exceed a repository's own star total, and a figure for the difference would be wrong exactly where it looks most precise.

Notes on this comparison

  • Which has more GitHub stars, chroma-core/chroma or facebookresearch/faiss?

    GitHub reports 40,914 stars for facebookresearch/faiss and 29,316 for chroma-core/chroma.

  • Do both star histories cover the same period?

    Not necessarily, and each chart names its own. chroma-core/chroma — Historical star data · Covers through September 16, 2026 · Still updating. facebookresearch/faiss — Historical star data · Covers through September 16, 2026 · Still updating. Since July 2026 GitHub serves a repository's stargazer list only to its own admins and collaborators, so one series can stop on a fixed date while the other keeps flowing from public archive events.

  • How is this comparison computed?

    Star totals come from public repository metadata. The two curves are each repository's stored star series drawn on shared axes, from whichever source is named above. Repository-health figures are computed independently from each project's commit history.