Skip to content

twbs/.github

Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.

Open on GitHub
Current stars
15
Activity since
2021
Latest activity
Sep 2025

Public star activity

Last 30 days
+1
Last 90 days
+1
Actions / day
0.0
Public star actions

stars from June 15, 2021 to September 11, 2025, peaking at 15.15 STARS4 YR 3 MO15SEP 2025JUN 2021

15 stars on September 11, 2025.

stars by date
Datestars
June 15, 20211
June 17, 20212
September 7, 20213
November 12, 20214
February 2, 20225
September 25, 20226
October 2, 20227
December 17, 20228
February 19, 20239
March 8, 202310
November 17, 202311
May 9, 202412
May 26, 202413
August 12, 202414
September 11, 202515

The last 90 days run in line with its lifetime average.

The commit history reads twbs/.github a second time

methodology

Fix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.

Fix-labelled changes
Fix-labelled changes for twbs/.github
File change frequency
File change frequency for twbs/.github
Bus factor
Bus factor for twbs/.github
Maintenance pulse
Maintenance pulse for twbs/.github
Contributors
Contributors for twbs/.github
Language activity
Language activity for twbs/.github
Commit activity
Commit activity for twbs/.github
Recent TODO/FIXME movement
Recent TODO/FIXME movement for twbs/.github

Attention is not adoption.

Stars against usage

No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.

Earned badges

badge studio

Maintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.

Reading badge evidence for twbs/.github.

Notes on twbs/.github

How many stars does twbs/.github have?
GitHub currently reports 15 stars for twbs/.github. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
What does recent star activity look like for .github?
gitdebt observed about 1 public star actions for twbs/.github over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's in line with its lifetime average activity pace.
Is .github still active?
Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for twbs/.github in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
When was .github created?
twbs/.github was created on October 31, 2020. The first public star activity observed for twbs/.github is from Jun 2021.

Put this drawing in your README

markdown for agents

The block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.

README.md · twbs/.github star history
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/twbs/.github?ref=readme">
  <picture>
    <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/twbs/.github/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
    <img alt="twbs/.github star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/twbs/.github/chart.svg?theme=light" />
  </picture>
</a>

<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through September 11, 2025 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/twbs/.github?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>

Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.

Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.