Skip to content

tokio-rs/async

Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.

Open on GitHub
Current stars
24
Activity since
2019
Latest activity
Nov 2025

Public star activity

Last 30 days
+1
Last 90 days
+1
Actions / day
0.0
Public star actions

stars from June 5, 2019 to November 23, 2025, peaking at 27.27 STARS6 YR 6 MO27NOV 2025JUN 2019

27 stars on November 23, 2025.

stars by date
Datestars
June 5, 20196
June 6, 201911
June 7, 201914
June 11, 201917
June 14, 201918
June 19, 201919
July 9, 201920
July 30, 201921
May 14, 202122
May 29, 202123
January 12, 202324
April 2, 202325
April 21, 202526
November 23, 202527

The last 90 days run in line with its lifetime average.

The commit history reads tokio-rs/async a second time

methodology

Fix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.

Fix-labelled changes
Fix-labelled changes for tokio-rs/async
File change frequency
File change frequency for tokio-rs/async
Bus factor
Bus factor for tokio-rs/async
Maintenance pulse
Maintenance pulse for tokio-rs/async
Contributors
Contributors for tokio-rs/async
Language activity
Language activity for tokio-rs/async
Commit activity
Commit activity for tokio-rs/async
Recent TODO/FIXME movement
Recent TODO/FIXME movement for tokio-rs/async

Attention is not adoption.

Stars against usage

No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.

Earned badges

badge studio

Maintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.

Reading badge evidence for tokio-rs/async.

Notes on tokio-rs/async

How many stars does tokio-rs/async have?
GitHub currently reports 24 stars for tokio-rs/async. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
What does recent star activity look like for async?
gitdebt observed about 1 public star actions for tokio-rs/async over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's in line with its lifetime average activity pace.
Is async still active?
Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for tokio-rs/async in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
When was async created?
tokio-rs/async was created on June 5, 2019. The first public star activity observed for tokio-rs/async is from Jun 2019.

Put this drawing in your README

markdown for agents

The block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.

README.md · tokio-rs/async star history
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/tokio-rs/async?ref=readme">
  <picture>
    <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/tokio-rs/async/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
    <img alt="tokio-rs/async star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/tokio-rs/async/chart.svg?theme=light" />
  </picture>
</a>

<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through November 23, 2025 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/tokio-rs/async?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>

Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.

Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.