sequelize/website
Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.
- Current stars
- 30
- Activity since
- 2022
- Latest activity
- May 2025
Public star activity
- Last 30 days
- +1
- Last 90 days
- +1
- Actions / day
- 0.0
34 stars on May 24, 2025.
| Date | stars |
|---|---|
| March 13, 2022 | 3 |
| April 6, 2022 | 4 |
| April 21, 2022 | 5 |
| April 30, 2022 | 6 |
| June 14, 2022 | 7 |
| July 14, 2022 | 8 |
| July 30, 2022 | 9 |
| August 12, 2022 | 11 |
| September 9, 2022 | 12 |
| October 6, 2022 | 13 |
| October 12, 2022 | 14 |
| October 19, 2022 | 15 |
| November 16, 2022 | 16 |
| January 25, 2023 | 17 |
| January 30, 2023 | 20 |
| February 12, 2023 | 21 |
| April 17, 2023 | 22 |
| May 29, 2023 | 23 |
| June 10, 2023 | 24 |
| June 17, 2023 | 25 |
| July 28, 2023 | 26 |
| October 3, 2023 | 27 |
| February 2, 2024 | 28 |
| March 4, 2024 | 29 |
| May 10, 2024 | 30 |
| May 20, 2024 | 31 |
| August 18, 2024 | 32 |
| August 22, 2024 | 33 |
| May 24, 2025 | 34 |
The last 90 days run behind its lifetime average, which is ordinary for a mature project.
The commit history reads sequelize/website a second time
methodologyFix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.
Attention is not adoption.
Stars against usage
No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.
Earned badges
badge studioMaintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.
Reading badge evidence for sequelize/website.
Notes on sequelize/website
- How many stars does sequelize/website have?
- GitHub currently reports 30 stars for sequelize/website. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
- What does recent star activity look like for website?
- gitdebt observed about 1 public star actions for sequelize/website over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's below its lifetime average activity pace, which is common for mature projects.
- Is website still active?
- Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for sequelize/website in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
- When was website created?
- sequelize/website was created on March 12, 2022. The first public star activity observed for sequelize/website is from Mar 2022.
Read website against a neighbour
comparison builderPut this drawing in your README
markdown for agentsThe block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/sequelize/website?ref=readme">
<picture>
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/sequelize/website/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
<img alt="sequelize/website star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/sequelize/website/chart.svg?theme=light" />
</picture>
</a>
<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through May 24, 2025 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/sequelize/website?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.
Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.