Skip to content

redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk

Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.

Open on GitHub
Current stars
29
Activity since
2025
Latest activity
Aug 2025

Public star activity

Last 30 days
+4
Last 90 days
+9
Actions / day
0.1
Public star actions

stars from May 18, 2025 to August 21, 2025, peaking at 10.10 STARS3 MO10AUG 2025MAY 2025

10 stars on August 21, 2025.

stars by date
Datestars
May 18, 20251
May 27, 20252
June 11, 20253
June 25, 20254
June 27, 20255
July 2, 20256
July 27, 20257
August 20, 20258
August 21, 202510

The commit history reads redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk a second time

methodology

Fix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.

Fix-labelled changes
Fix-labelled changes for redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk
File change frequency
File change frequency for redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk
Bus factor
Bus factor for redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk
Maintenance pulse
Maintenance pulse for redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk
Contributors
Contributors for redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk
Language activity
Language activity for redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk
Commit activity
Commit activity for redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk
Recent TODO/FIXME movement
Recent TODO/FIXME movement for redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk

Attention is not adoption.

Stars against usage

No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.

Earned badges

badge studio

Maintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.

Reading badge evidence for redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk.

Notes on redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk

How many stars does redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk have?
GitHub currently reports 29 stars for redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
What does recent star activity look like for awesome-rwsdk?
gitdebt observed about 9 public star actions for redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 4 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present.
Is awesome-rwsdk still active?
Public archive data shows about 4 star actions for redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
When was awesome-rwsdk created?
redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk was created on May 15, 2025. The first public star activity observed for redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk is from May 2025.

Put this drawing in your README

markdown for agents

The block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.

README.md · redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk star history
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk?ref=readme">
  <picture>
    <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
    <img alt="redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk/chart.svg?theme=light" />
  </picture>
</a>

<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through August 21, 2025 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/redwoodjs/awesome-rwsdk?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>

Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.

Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.