Skip to content

redwoodjs/applywize

Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.

Open on GitHub
Current stars
13
Activity since
2025
Latest activity
Mar 2026

Public star activity

Last 30 days
+1
Last 90 days
+1
Actions / day
0.0
Public star actions

stars from May 8, 2025 to March 28, 2026, peaking at 7.7 STARS11 MO7MAR 2026MAY 2025

7 stars on March 28, 2026.

stars by date
Datestars
May 8, 20251
May 11, 20252
May 14, 20253
May 20, 20254
May 21, 20255
October 23, 20256
March 28, 20267

The last 90 days run behind its lifetime average, which is ordinary for a mature project.

The commit history reads redwoodjs/applywize a second time

methodology

Fix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.

Fix-labelled changes
Fix-labelled changes for redwoodjs/applywize
File change frequency
File change frequency for redwoodjs/applywize
Bus factor
Bus factor for redwoodjs/applywize
Maintenance pulse
Maintenance pulse for redwoodjs/applywize
Contributors
Contributors for redwoodjs/applywize
Language activity
Language activity for redwoodjs/applywize
Commit activity
Commit activity for redwoodjs/applywize
Recent TODO/FIXME movement
Recent TODO/FIXME movement for redwoodjs/applywize

Attention is not adoption.

Stars against usage

No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.

Earned badges

badge studio

Maintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.

Reading badge evidence for redwoodjs/applywize.

Notes on redwoodjs/applywize

How many stars does redwoodjs/applywize have?
GitHub currently reports 13 stars for redwoodjs/applywize. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
What does recent star activity look like for applywize?
gitdebt observed about 1 public star actions for redwoodjs/applywize over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's below its lifetime average activity pace, which is common for mature projects.
Is applywize still active?
Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for redwoodjs/applywize in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
When was applywize created?
redwoodjs/applywize was created on March 26, 2025. The first public star activity observed for redwoodjs/applywize is from May 2025.

Put this drawing in your README

markdown for agents

The block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.

README.md · redwoodjs/applywize star history
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/redwoodjs/applywize?ref=readme">
  <picture>
    <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/redwoodjs/applywize/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
    <img alt="redwoodjs/applywize star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/redwoodjs/applywize/chart.svg?theme=light" />
  </picture>
</a>

<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through March 28, 2026 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/redwoodjs/applywize?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>

Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.

Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.