Skip to content

rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli

Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.

Open on GitHub
Current stars
106
Activity since
2016
Latest activity
Dec 2024

Public star activity

Last 30 days
+2
Last 90 days
+2
Actions / day
0.0
Public star actions

stars from November 9, 2016 to December 8, 2024, peaking at 121.121 STARS8 YR 1 MO121DEC 2024NOV 2016

121 stars on December 8, 2024.

stars by date
Datestars
November 9, 20164
November 10, 20166
November 11, 201610
November 12, 201612
November 13, 201613
November 16, 201614
November 18, 201615
December 13, 201616
December 20, 201617
January 21, 201718
February 21, 201719
February 22, 201720
February 25, 201721
March 7, 201722
March 14, 201723
March 29, 201724
April 7, 201725
April 8, 201726
April 9, 201727
April 19, 201728
May 12, 201729
June 15, 201730
June 27, 201731
June 30, 201732
July 4, 201733
July 26, 201734
August 15, 201735
August 23, 201736
September 29, 201737
October 6, 201738
October 11, 201739
October 23, 201740
November 23, 201741
December 9, 201742
December 14, 201743
January 29, 201844
February 21, 201845
March 2, 201846
March 6, 201847
March 7, 201848
March 15, 201849
April 2, 201850
April 9, 201851
April 24, 201852
May 31, 201853
June 21, 201854
July 1, 201855
July 9, 201856
July 11, 201857
July 13, 201858
August 13, 201859
November 17, 201860
November 18, 201861
December 15, 201862
January 9, 201963
January 23, 201965
February 4, 201966
February 20, 201967
February 25, 201968
April 3, 201969
April 8, 201970
May 8, 201971
May 31, 201972
June 1, 201973
June 11, 201974
July 3, 201975
July 13, 201977
July 30, 201978
August 5, 201979
August 7, 201980
September 2, 201981
September 20, 201982
November 17, 201983
November 29, 201984
December 12, 201985
December 24, 201986
January 15, 202087
February 7, 202088
February 10, 202089
February 24, 202090
February 27, 202091
February 28, 202092
March 5, 202095
March 25, 202096
March 26, 202097
April 13, 202098
April 18, 2020100
May 12, 2020101
June 8, 2020102
June 11, 2020103
July 23, 2020104
August 11, 2020105
August 15, 2020106
September 16, 2020107
September 22, 2020108
October 2, 2020109
October 5, 2020110
October 28, 2020111
November 14, 2020112
June 22, 2021113
November 12, 2021114
August 9, 2022115
August 29, 2022116
December 10, 2022117
June 2, 2024119
November 9, 2024120
December 8, 2024121

The last 90 days run behind its lifetime average, which is ordinary for a mature project.

Observed activity milestones: 100 around Apr 2020

The commit history reads rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli a second time

methodology

Fix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.

Fix-labelled changes
Fix-labelled changes for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli
File change frequency
File change frequency for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli
Bus factor
Bus factor for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli
Maintenance pulse
Maintenance pulse for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli
Contributors
Contributors for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli
Language activity
Language activity for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli
Commit activity
Commit activity for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli
Recent TODO/FIXME movement
Recent TODO/FIXME movement for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli

Attention is not adoption.

Stars against usage

No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.

Earned badges

badge studio

Maintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.

Reading badge evidence for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli.

Notes on rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli

How many stars does rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli have?
GitHub currently reports 106 stars for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
What does recent star activity look like for rabbitmq-cli?
gitdebt observed about 2 public star actions for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 2 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's below its lifetime average activity pace, which is common for mature projects.
Is rabbitmq-cli still active?
Public archive data shows about 2 star actions for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
When was rabbitmq-cli created?
rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli was created on February 3, 2016. The first public star activity observed for rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli is from Nov 2016.

Put this drawing in your README

markdown for agents

The block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.

README.md · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli star history
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli?ref=readme">
  <picture>
    <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
    <img alt="rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli/chart.svg?theme=light" />
  </picture>
</a>

<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through December 8, 2024 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-cli?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>

Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.

Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.