Skip to content

ggml-org/.github

Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.

Open on GitHub
Current stars
12
Activity since
2025
Latest activity
Apr 2026

Public star activity

Last 30 days
+1
Last 90 days
+2
Actions / day
0.0
Public star actions

stars from January 26, 2025 to April 4, 2026, peaking at 10.10 STARS1 YR 2 MO10APR 2026JAN 2025

10 stars on April 4, 2026.

stars by date
Datestars
January 26, 20253
January 27, 20254
February 20, 20255
March 29, 20256
August 18, 20257
November 10, 20258
March 3, 20269
April 4, 202610

The last 90 days run in line with its lifetime average.

The commit history reads ggml-org/.github a second time

methodology

Fix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.

Fix-labelled changes
Fix-labelled changes for ggml-org/.github
File change frequency
File change frequency for ggml-org/.github
Bus factor
Bus factor for ggml-org/.github
Maintenance pulse
Maintenance pulse for ggml-org/.github
Contributors
Contributors for ggml-org/.github
Language activity
Language activity for ggml-org/.github
Commit activity
Commit activity for ggml-org/.github
Recent TODO/FIXME movement
Recent TODO/FIXME movement for ggml-org/.github

Attention is not adoption.

Stars against usage

No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.

Earned badges

badge studio

Maintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.

Reading badge evidence for ggml-org/.github.

Notes on ggml-org/.github

How many stars does ggml-org/.github have?
GitHub currently reports 12 stars for ggml-org/.github. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
What does recent star activity look like for .github?
gitdebt observed about 2 public star actions for ggml-org/.github over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's in line with its lifetime average activity pace.
Is .github still active?
Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for ggml-org/.github in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
When was .github created?
ggml-org/.github was created on January 26, 2025. The first public star activity observed for ggml-org/.github is from Jan 2025.

Put this drawing in your README

markdown for agents

The block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.

README.md · ggml-org/.github star history
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/ggml-org/.github?ref=readme">
  <picture>
    <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/ggml-org/.github/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
    <img alt="ggml-org/.github star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/ggml-org/.github/chart.svg?theme=light" />
  </picture>
</a>

<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through April 4, 2026 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/ggml-org/.github?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>

Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.

Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.