expo/expo-template-default
Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.
- Current stars
- 37
- Activity since
- 2024
- Latest activity
- Mar 2026
Public star activity
- Last 30 days
- +1
- Last 90 days
- +1
- Actions / day
- 0.0
20 stars on March 2, 2026.
| Date | stars |
|---|---|
| May 14, 2024 | 1 |
| June 12, 2024 | 2 |
| September 26, 2024 | 3 |
| November 6, 2024 | 4 |
| November 7, 2024 | 5 |
| November 14, 2024 | 6 |
| November 19, 2024 | 7 |
| November 30, 2024 | 8 |
| December 12, 2024 | 9 |
| December 23, 2024 | 10 |
| January 9, 2025 | 11 |
| January 28, 2025 | 12 |
| January 29, 2025 | 13 |
| February 7, 2025 | 14 |
| March 19, 2025 | 15 |
| March 27, 2025 | 16 |
| May 3, 2025 | 17 |
| August 16, 2025 | 18 |
| November 22, 2025 | 19 |
| March 2, 2026 | 20 |
The last 90 days run behind its lifetime average, which is ordinary for a mature project.
The commit history reads expo/expo-template-default a second time
methodologyFix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.
Attention is not adoption.
Stars against usage
No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.
Earned badges
badge studioMaintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.
Reading badge evidence for expo/expo-template-default.
Notes on expo/expo-template-default
- How many stars does expo/expo-template-default have?
- GitHub currently reports 37 stars for expo/expo-template-default. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
- What does recent star activity look like for expo-template-default?
- gitdebt observed about 1 public star actions for expo/expo-template-default over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's below its lifetime average activity pace, which is common for mature projects.
- Is expo-template-default still active?
- Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for expo/expo-template-default in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
- When was expo-template-default created?
- expo/expo-template-default was created on April 26, 2024. The first public star activity observed for expo/expo-template-default is from May 2024.
Read expo-template-default against a neighbour
comparison builderPut this drawing in your README
markdown for agentsThe block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/expo/expo-template-default?ref=readme">
<picture>
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/expo/expo-template-default/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
<img alt="expo/expo-template-default star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/expo/expo-template-default/chart.svg?theme=light" />
</picture>
</a>
<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through March 2, 2026 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/expo/expo-template-default?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.
Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.