Skip to content

electerious/rosid-handler-sass

Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.

Open on GitHub
Stars
5
History since
2016
Latest star
Apr 2021

Star history

Last 30 days
+1
Last 90 days
+1
Stars / day
0.0
Cumulative stars

stars from November 28, 2016 to April 28, 2021, peaking at 5.5 STARS4 YR 5 MO5APR 2021NOV 2016

5 stars on April 28, 2021.

stars by date
Datestars
November 28, 20161
October 20, 20172
March 13, 20183
March 1, 20194
April 28, 20215

The last 90 days run ahead of this repository's lifetime average.

The commit history reads electerious/rosid-handler-sass a second time

methodology

Fix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.

Fix-labelled changes
Fix-labelled changes for electerious/rosid-handler-sass
File change frequency
File change frequency for electerious/rosid-handler-sass
Bus factor
Bus factor for electerious/rosid-handler-sass
Maintenance pulse
Maintenance pulse for electerious/rosid-handler-sass
Contributors
Contributors for electerious/rosid-handler-sass
Language activity
Language activity for electerious/rosid-handler-sass
Commit activity
Commit activity for electerious/rosid-handler-sass
Recent TODO/FIXME movement
Recent TODO/FIXME movement for electerious/rosid-handler-sass

Attention is not adoption.

Stars against usage

No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.

Earned badges

badge studio

Maintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.

Reading badge evidence for electerious/rosid-handler-sass.

Notes on electerious/rosid-handler-sass

How many stars does electerious/rosid-handler-sass have?
GitHub currently reports 5 stars for electerious/rosid-handler-sass, with about 1 of them added in the last 90 days.
How fast is rosid-handler-sass growing?
electerious/rosid-handler-sass gained about 1 stars over the last 90 days of its history (about 1 in the last 30) — figures are approximate for older repos, whose star history is downsampled. That's faster than its lifetime average growth pace.
Is rosid-handler-sass still active?
electerious/rosid-handler-sass is still attracting attention — about 1 new GitHub stars in the most recent 30 days of its history. For commit-level signals, see the commit activity heatmap, commit trend, and contributors charts on this page.
When was rosid-handler-sass created?
electerious/rosid-handler-sass was created on December 27, 2015 and earned its first GitHub star in Nov 2016.

Put this drawing in your README

markdown for agents

The block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.

README.md · electerious/rosid-handler-sass star history
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/electerious/rosid-handler-sass?ref=readme">
  <picture>
    <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/electerious/rosid-handler-sass/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
    <img alt="electerious/rosid-handler-sass star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/electerious/rosid-handler-sass/chart.svg?theme=light" />
  </picture>
</a>

<sub>Star history source: GitHub star history · Covers through November 14, 2026 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/electerious/rosid-handler-sass?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>

Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.

Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.