Skip to content

electerious/pdfconcat

Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.

Open on GitHub
Current stars
3
Activity since
2014
Latest activity
Oct 2025

Public star activity

Last 30 days
+1
Last 90 days
+1
Actions / day
0.0
Public star actions

stars from July 19, 2014 to October 3, 2025, peaking at 5.5 STARS11 YR 3 MO5OCT 2025JUL 2014

5 stars on October 3, 2025.

stars by date
Datestars
July 19, 20141
May 20, 20202
April 29, 20213
November 23, 20214
October 3, 20255

The last 90 days run ahead of this repository's lifetime average.

The commit history reads electerious/pdfconcat a second time

methodology

Fix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.

Fix-labelled changes
Fix-labelled changes for electerious/pdfconcat
File change frequency
File change frequency for electerious/pdfconcat
Bus factor
Bus factor for electerious/pdfconcat
Maintenance pulse
Maintenance pulse for electerious/pdfconcat
Contributors
Contributors for electerious/pdfconcat
Language activity
Language activity for electerious/pdfconcat
Commit activity
Commit activity for electerious/pdfconcat
Recent TODO/FIXME movement
Recent TODO/FIXME movement for electerious/pdfconcat

Attention is not adoption.

Stars against usage

No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.

Earned badges

badge studio

Maintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.

Reading badge evidence for electerious/pdfconcat.

Notes on electerious/pdfconcat

How many stars does electerious/pdfconcat have?
GitHub currently reports 3 stars for electerious/pdfconcat. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
What does recent star activity look like for pdfconcat?
gitdebt observed about 1 public star actions for electerious/pdfconcat over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's faster than its lifetime average activity pace.
Is pdfconcat still active?
Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for electerious/pdfconcat in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
When was pdfconcat created?
electerious/pdfconcat was created on July 19, 2014. The first public star activity observed for electerious/pdfconcat is from Jul 2014.

Put this drawing in your README

markdown for agents

The block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.

README.md · electerious/pdfconcat star history
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/electerious/pdfconcat?ref=readme">
  <picture>
    <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/electerious/pdfconcat/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
    <img alt="electerious/pdfconcat star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/electerious/pdfconcat/chart.svg?theme=light" />
  </picture>
</a>

<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through October 3, 2025 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/electerious/pdfconcat?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>

Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.

Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.