electerious/nice-try
Star momentum, maintenance concentration, contributor health, and codebase change — one report built from public repository data.
- Current stars
- 69
- Activity since
- 2016
- Latest activity
- Mar 2025
Public star activity
- Last 30 days
- +1
- Last 90 days
- +1
- Actions / day
- 0.0
71 stars on March 10, 2025.
| Date | stars |
|---|---|
| July 30, 2016 | 1 |
| November 28, 2016 | 2 |
| December 11, 2016 | 3 |
| June 29, 2017 | 4 |
| April 29, 2018 | 5 |
| May 25, 2018 | 6 |
| September 19, 2018 | 7 |
| November 27, 2018 | 9 |
| November 28, 2018 | 10 |
| November 29, 2018 | 14 |
| December 3, 2018 | 16 |
| December 6, 2018 | 18 |
| December 20, 2018 | 19 |
| January 7, 2019 | 20 |
| January 25, 2019 | 21 |
| February 6, 2019 | 23 |
| February 7, 2019 | 24 |
| February 12, 2019 | 27 |
| February 21, 2019 | 28 |
| February 28, 2019 | 29 |
| April 17, 2019 | 30 |
| May 27, 2019 | 31 |
| June 11, 2019 | 32 |
| June 22, 2019 | 33 |
| August 14, 2019 | 34 |
| August 18, 2019 | 35 |
| August 21, 2019 | 36 |
| August 23, 2019 | 37 |
| September 22, 2019 | 38 |
| December 10, 2019 | 39 |
| January 23, 2020 | 40 |
| February 13, 2020 | 41 |
| March 26, 2020 | 42 |
| May 22, 2020 | 43 |
| June 3, 2020 | 44 |
| July 28, 2020 | 45 |
| July 30, 2020 | 46 |
| August 19, 2020 | 47 |
| September 6, 2020 | 48 |
| September 14, 2020 | 49 |
| November 14, 2020 | 50 |
| January 4, 2021 | 51 |
| January 7, 2021 | 52 |
| February 23, 2021 | 53 |
| April 29, 2021 | 54 |
| June 24, 2021 | 55 |
| July 5, 2021 | 56 |
| August 23, 2021 | 57 |
| September 23, 2021 | 58 |
| November 15, 2021 | 59 |
| December 24, 2021 | 60 |
| February 22, 2022 | 61 |
| March 18, 2022 | 62 |
| August 9, 2022 | 63 |
| September 12, 2022 | 64 |
| September 30, 2022 | 65 |
| October 1, 2022 | 66 |
| February 26, 2023 | 67 |
| March 8, 2023 | 68 |
| March 16, 2023 | 69 |
| November 10, 2023 | 70 |
| March 10, 2025 | 71 |
The last 90 days run behind its lifetime average, which is ordinary for a mature project.
The commit history reads electerious/nice-try a second time
methodologyFix-labelled changes, file change frequency, ownership concentration and maintenance cadence, each computed from this repository's analyzed commit window. None of them is derived from stars, which is why they are allowed to disagree with the curve above.
Attention is not adoption.
Stars against usage
No published package was detected for this repository, so there is nothing to lay over star growth.
Earned badges
badge studioMaintenance, ownership and star-momentum signals, computed from the same commit and star history and embeddable as static images.
Reading badge evidence for electerious/nice-try.
Notes on electerious/nice-try
- How many stars does electerious/nice-try have?
- GitHub currently reports 69 stars for electerious/nice-try. The chart itself is rebuilt from historical star data, which records star actions and not unstars, so it reads as an attention signal rather than a net star count.
- What does recent star activity look like for nice-try?
- gitdebt observed about 1 public star actions for electerious/nice-try over the latest 90 days of archive coverage (about 1 in the latest 30). This is an approximate attention signal, not a net-star count, because unstars are not present. That's below its lifetime average activity pace, which is common for mature projects.
- Is nice-try still active?
- Public archive data shows about 1 star actions for electerious/nice-try in the latest 30 days of coverage. For repository activity, use the commit heatmap, commit trend, and contributor charts on this page.
- When was nice-try created?
- electerious/nice-try was created on July 30, 2016. The first public star activity observed for electerious/nice-try is from Jul 2016.
Read nice-try against a neighbour
comparison builderPut this drawing in your README
markdown for agentsThe block below publishes the chart with its source and coverage date stated beside it — the same three facts the title block above shows, as text a reader can check. The prompt underneath hands a coding agent the badges and repo-health charts as well.
<a href="https://gitdebt.com/electerious/nice-try?ref=readme">
<picture>
<source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/electerious/nice-try/chart.svg?theme=dark" />
<img alt="electerious/nice-try star history" src="https://api.gitdebt.com/api/repos/electerious/nice-try/chart.svg?theme=light" />
</picture>
</a>
<sub>Star history source: Historical star data · Covers through March 10, 2025 · Still updating — <a href="https://gitdebt.com/electerious/nice-try?ref=readme">gitdebt</a></sub>Light and dark variants, alt text, and one provenance line. Provenance is text in your README, never baked into the image URL, so the chart stays cacheable.
Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any coding agent with your checkout open. It carries the measured numbers, the exact snippets, and the rules — including replacing an existing star-history widget in place rather than stacking a second chart under it.